Quote:
Originally Posted by N0ctrnl
I don't understand the militant stance on this one. It's absolutely a limitation of dynamic zones vs. static ones. Sure, it's easily overcome, and not expensive to do so, but to pretend that dynamic zones fit situations like this is just not right.
|
What is there to pretend?
It's pretty simple.
And I don't understand why there is even an arugment against it.
Why would you allocate say 80 zones a head of time as statics, memory, usage, and idle CPU utilization that are completely unecessary when essentially the same functionality of a static can be fulfilled on demand via dynamic when a zone request is booted, and then nailed up for as long as you wish (a week if you wish).
It serves the exact same purpose.
But what do I know, I don't run any servers or anything