Requirements change recently?

[provocating]

I compiled not a week ago with no errors, today I get this. I am on Debian 7

CMake Error at /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:97 (MESSAGE):
  Could NOT find ZLIB (missing: ZLIB_LIBRARY) (found version "1.2.7")
Call Stack (most recent call first):
  /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindPackageHandleStandardArgs.cmake:288 (_FPHSA_FAILURE_MESSAGE)
  /usr/share/cmake-2.8/Modules/FindZLIB.cmake:85 (FIND_PACKAGE_HANDLE_STANDARD_ARGS)
  CMakeLists.txt:305 (FIND_PACKAGE)

[provocating]

I do not think this is on the EqEmu end now. I have no idea what happened to my Debian install for our Dev server, but something screwed up on it. I may just reinstall, that may be quick than figuring this out.

[demonstar55]

I dont think it should happen, but make sure your development headers are the same version as the packag, although I'm not sure that would be that big of an issue ... You can also try deleting the cmake files (the ones that cmake generates)

[provocating]

I built a completely new VM with Debian and the problem followed it. It ended up being the strangest thing. I had the source files on my Nas and it did not like the pathing. CMake could hardly find any libraries. It was a strange issue but I put underscores in the path and everything was fixed after deleting the Cmake cache.

[Uleat]

CMake 2.8.12 (or so..) enforced the non-use of whitespace


http://www.eqemulator.org/forums/showthread.php?t=37892

[provocating]

Originally Posted by Uleat

CMake 2.8.12 (or so..) enforced the non-use of whitespace


http://www.eqemulator.org/forums/showthread.php?t=37892

Well that would do it. Probably 4 hours or so later through trial and error I figured it out.

[provocating]

I spoke too soon, zone did not build.

spawngroup.cpp:54:77: error: cast from ‘SpawnGroup*’ to ‘uint32 {aka unsigned int}’ loses precision [-fpermissive]
make[2]: *** [zone/CMakeFiles/zone.dir/spawngroup.cpp.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [zone/CMakeFiles/zone.dir/all] Error 2

Ahh, I see the reason I got that is I was playing with the debug level, need to back it down.

[Uleat]

Yeah, I spent some time on that one myself.

I put it out there as an 'info' post..but, my choice of keywords could have been better.


I run at '12' on my windows test server..what level was yours at?

I went through last year some time and 'tried' to fix some bad links in the pre-proc segments..but, I know there were some
linux-specific ones that I didn't touch.


EDIT: Disregard..I see what you're saying there. Thought it might have been a unix pre-proc.

[provocating]

I think I had it at 10 or 11