Go Back   EQEmulator Home > EQEmulator Forums > Development > Development::Feature Requests

Development::Feature Requests Post suggestions/feature requests here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 10-02-2008, 07:45 AM
trevius's Avatar
trevius
Developer
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 5,946
Default

Woot! I think I found part of what KLS is talking about:

zone/updatemgr.cpp
Code:
//squared distances for each level
//these values are pulled out of my ass, should be tuned some day
const float UpdateManager::level_distances2[UPDATE_LEVELS]
	= { 50*50, 250*250, 500*500, 800*800 };
	
//delay between sending packets in each level, in ms
//its best if they are all multiples of UPDATE_RESOLUTION
//these values are pulled out of my ass, should be tuned some day
const int32 UpdateManager::level_timers[UPDATE_LEVELS+1]
	= { UPDATE_RESOLUTION,		//.3s
		2*UPDATE_RESOLUTION, 	//.6s
		3*UPDATE_RESOLUTION,	//.9s
		9*UPDATE_RESOLUTION,	//~2s
		34*UPDATE_RESOLUTION	//~10s
	  };
I like how he says they are pulled out of his ass and need to be tuned lol. If there was a way to set these on a per zone basis, I think that would be amazing. If that would be too complex, I think these could each easily just have rules tied to them so you can adjust them all manually to find which is the best combination.

I think more could definitely be done, but I will have to look into finding other parts that could possibly be tweaked further.
__________________
Trevazar/Trevius Owner of: Storm Haven
Everquest Emulator FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) - Read It!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-02-2008, 08:10 AM
So_1337
Dragon
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 689
Default

Quote:
We have already been testing a quest system to depopall() on all trash mobs when a boss mob or named is being killed. It seems to completely stop all lag as compared to previously people would go LD and lag extremely bad in some cases.
Just a quick note on that. We used to have trouble on our server before we had our DS3 line installed. We'd have too many players whacking on things in heavily NPC-populated zones. Killing Yelinak in particular comes to mind. Now, for Skyshrine, our trash mobs were already all set to a 30 minute repop. We'd do a #depopzone and then manually spawn him so we'd have a chance at killing him without us all getting bugged out. That worked out fine, unless we were slow and the zone repopped before then. At that point, the zone is completely overwhelmed, and everything will freeze for a good long while. 500+ NPCs in Skyshrine =X

Anyway, just my thoughts. I'm sure that if you're doing this, you've already thought of it, but wanted to suggest that if you use quest::depopzone that you make sure to disable the respawn timers until the boss has died, and then re-enable them. Though that only sounds useful for fights that aren't intended to have the added difficulty of add control =)

Just my thoughts, this sounds like a really good suggestion if a reasonable way to implement it can be found.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-02-2008, 12:19 PM
kayen85
Sarnak
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 50
Default

Working with Trev on this,

We have as system set up atm that if an event is engaged, we do a zone wide depop of all trash mobs using quest::depopall(npcid) for each trash, then pop some KOS guard mobs in specific locations so people can't just run around the zone with a few others things built in to avoid abuse. When event is over zone repops all the trash with quest. This works fine. But obviously the flaws are there which is it really affects any other group in the zone forcing a 8-10 minutes of down time. Plus if you want to do an event with smaller force it could take even longer, and then if your moving from event to event quickly you could basically have the zone locked up for a while making it unplayable by others. Is that worth it so everyone doesn't have a 70% chance to lock up/crash when fighting the event, probably but its not the ideal solution.

There are other ways around it which are better, but just require more advanced planning and coding useing standard scripts, set up certain areas of the zone with only certain NPCid's then have quest mobs spawn and check aggro if any players are in that area and if its clear then depop it, otherwise leave it up and hope by the time they are done in the area the event is over.

But really all these solutions are cumbersome and were praying we can get something more solid.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-02-2008, 07:16 PM
ChaosSlayer
Demi-God
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,032
Default

anoher thing: you think turning OFF Npc buff friends would help with the lag?
Since npc needs to not only buff all their friends but also keep a watch when their buffs expire etc
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-02-2008, 11:50 PM
KLS
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,348
Default

Mob::SendPosUpdate(int8 iSendToSelf) is where you would want to look. We have it hardcoded to 800 dist but it wouldn't be too hard to load that from the zone table and use a custom value instead. Turning off more advanced ai like spell casting and buffing when people aren't close to npcs and npcs aren't engaged is probably a good idea too.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 10-03-2008, 12:51 AM
MNWatchdog
Hill Giant
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 179
Default

How about have the server dynamically base the range it sends the clients updates of mobs info is based on if the person is moving around or not.

Someone staying relatively stationary doesnt need to get updates from mobs more than 400 distance, while someone running certainly would in order to avoid running into said mobs.

This also avoids having to set this range on a per zone bases.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-03-2008, 12:59 AM
MNWatchdog
Hill Giant
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 179
Default

PS You could even add a fudge factor based off current server population so when theres less people logged on the range would be longer and be shorter when more people are logged in.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 10-03-2008, 02:38 AM
Rocker8956
Hill Giant
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 117
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by KLS View Post
Mob::SendPosUpdate(int8 iSendToSelf) is where you would want to look. We have it hardcoded to 800 dist but it wouldn't be too hard to load that from the zone table and use a custom value instead. Turning off more advanced ai like spell casting and buffing when people aren't close to npcs and npcs aren't engaged is probably a good idea too.
I wrote some code that replaces the 800 found in Mob::SendPosUpdate(int8 iSendToSelf) with a distance pulled from the zone database. But I have aquestion that is probably dumb but Which would be better...

Query the database everytime the Mob::SendPosUpdate(int8 iSendToSelf) is called? I assume this would be a lot.
OR
Set a variable's value when the zone boots up based on a database query. Then get that variables value whenever Mob::SendPosUpdate(int8 iSendToSelf) is called?

Like I said probably dumb questions but I am not sure how often this would be hitting the database.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 10-03-2008, 04:03 AM
MNWatchdog
Hill Giant
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 179
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocker8956 View Post
I wrote some code that replaces the 800 found in Mob::SendPosUpdate(int8 iSendToSelf) with a distance pulled from the zone database. But I have aquestion that is probably dumb but Which would be better...

Query the database everytime the Mob::SendPosUpdate(int8 iSendToSelf) is called? I assume this would be a lot.
OR
Set a variable's value when the zone boots up based on a database query. Then get that variables value whenever Mob::SendPosUpdate(int8 iSendToSelf) is called?

Like I said probably dumb questions but I am not sure how often this would be hitting the database.
Do it the way I posted above.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10-03-2008, 04:27 AM
Derision
Developer
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,540
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rocker8956 View Post
Query the database everytime the Mob::SendPosUpdate(int8 iSendToSelf) is called? I assume this would be a lot.
That's the last thing you want to do. I just compiled zone with profiling enabled and stood in Dreadlands by Karnor's Castle for 60 seconds and there were around 4500 calls to that method.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10-03-2008, 05:56 AM
trevius's Avatar
trevius
Developer
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 5,946
Default

I would almost certainly say to set the variables on zone bootup. Seems to be the obvious choice. Anything that reduces the number of database hits is good, and setting that at zone bootup shouldn't cause any performance differences at all.

But, even though KLS says the 800 is hard coded, I can say that just by looking at what the MQ map shows, it seems pretty clear that the code I posted above is the code used for sending position updates. Within a range of 50ish, the movements on the map are almost perfectly smooth (.3 second timer), then from 50 to about 250, they are slightly less smooth (.6 second timer), and from 250 to 500 even slightly less smooth (.9 second timer), And anything from 500 to 800 is kinda choppy (2 second timer), and after that it uses the zonewide update setting, which by default is 1 minute, but if you set the rule it can be much higher.

So, I am not completely convinced that the 800 setting KLS mentioned is what is being used all of the time.

Here is the code that I think is handling those updates:

mob.cpp
Code:
void Mob::SendPosUpdate(int8 iSendToSelf) {
	EQApplicationPacket* app = new EQApplicationPacket(OP_ClientUpdate, sizeof(PlayerPositionUpdateServer_Struct));
	PlayerPositionUpdateServer_Struct* spu = (PlayerPositionUpdateServer_Struct*)app->pBuffer;
	MakeSpawnUpdate(spu);
	if (iSendToSelf == 2) {
		if (this->IsClient())
			this->CastToClient()->FastQueuePacket(&app,false);
	}
	else
#ifdef PACKET_UPDATE_MANAGER
		entity_list.QueueManaged(this, app, (iSendToSelf==0),false);
#else
		entity_list.QueueCloseClients(this, app, (iSendToSelf==0), 800, NULL, false);
#endif
	safe_delete(app);
}
entity.cpp
Code:
void EntityList::QueueManaged(Mob* sender, const EQApplicationPacket* app, bool ignore_sender, bool ackreq) {
	LinkedListIterator<Client*> iterator(client_list);
	
#ifdef PACKET_UPDATE_MANAGER
	EQApplicationPacket* tmp_app = app->Copy();
#endif
	
	iterator.Reset();
	while(iterator.MoreElements())
	{
		Client* ent = iterator.GetData();

		if ((!ignore_sender || ent != sender))
		{
#ifdef PACKET_UPDATE_MANAGER
			ent->GetUpdateManager()->QueuePacket(tmp_app, ackreq, sender, ent->DistNoRoot(*sender));
#else
			ent->QueuePacket(app, ackreq, Client::CLIENT_CONNECTED);
#endif
		}
		iterator.Advance();
	}
#ifdef PACKET_UPDATE_MANAGER
	EQApplicationPacket::PacketUsed(&tmp_app);
#endif
}


void EntityList::QueueClientsStatus(Mob* sender, const EQApplicationPacket* app, bool ignore_sender, int8 minstatus, int8 maxstatus)
{
	LinkedListIterator<Client*> iterator(client_list);
	
	iterator.Reset();
	while(iterator.MoreElements())
	{
		if ((!ignore_sender || iterator.GetData() != sender) && (iterator.GetData()->Admin() >= minstatus && iterator.GetData()->Admin() <= maxstatus))
		{
			iterator.GetData()->QueuePacket(app);
		}
		iterator.Advance();
	}	
}
updatemgr.cpp
Code:
void UpdateManager::QueuePacket(EQApplicationPacket *app, bool ack_req, Mob *from, float range2) {
	int r = UPDATE_LEVELS;
	UMMap *cur = levels;
	const float *cur_d = level_distances2;
	cur += UPDATE_LEVELS;	//move to the end.
	cur_d += UPDATE_LEVELS - 1;
	//work backwards since mobs are more likely to be further away
	for(r = UPDATE_LEVELS; r >= 0; r--, cur--, cur_d--) {
		if(range2 < *cur_d)
			continue;
		//this packet falls into this queue...
		uint32 id = MakeUpdateID(from, app);
//		if(r < 2)
//			net->QueuePacket(app, ack_req);
//LogFile->write(EQEMuLog::Debug, "Queueing packet from %s (0x%.4x) id=0x%x at level %d\n", from->GetName(), app->GetOpcode(), id, r);
		app->PacketReferenced();
		//reference decrementing is taken care of my UMType destructor
		//if anything is overwritten
		(*cur)[id] = UMType(app, ack_req);
//		(*cur)[id] = UMType(app->Copy(), ack_req);
		return;
	}
	//if we get here, were in trouble...
}
__________________
Trevazar/Trevius Owner of: Storm Haven
Everquest Emulator FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) - Read It!
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10-03-2008, 06:59 AM
KLS
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,348
Default

Yeah I'm right and wrong it depends if you have update manager enabled or not. By default it's turned off though.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 10-04-2008, 12:59 AM
Rocker8956
Hill Giant
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 117
Default

Well after looking into this a bit further it looks like I am going to duck out of this one. This code is really out of my league and I currently do not have time to learn it.
Sorry guys, I was going to give it a shot but don't have the time. Hopefully someone else understands all that code and how it works.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10-04-2008, 03:17 PM
trevius's Avatar
trevius
Developer
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 5,946
Default

Hmm, I haven't turned update manager on myself. But, after checking into it more, it seems like both are actually being used. Both update manager and the hard setting at the same time. It seems like the hard setting is the cutoff to where it will only use the zonewide update timer. But, within the hard setting it uses the settings from the update manager.

What I have done so far is to change the hard settings from 800 down to 400 like this:

mob.cpp
Code:
// this one just warps the mob to the current location
void Mob::SendPosition() {
	EQApplicationPacket* app = new EQApplicationPacket(OP_ClientUpdate, sizeof(PlayerPositionUpdateServer_Struct));
	PlayerPositionUpdateServer_Struct* spu = (PlayerPositionUpdateServer_Struct*)app->pBuffer;	
	MakeSpawnUpdateNoDelta(spu);
//?	spu->heading *= 8;
#ifdef PACKET_UPDATE_MANAGER
	entity_list.QueueManaged(this, app, true);
#else
	entity_list.QueueCloseClients(this, app, true, 400);
#endif
	safe_delete(app);
}
Code:
// this one is for mobs on the move, with deltas - this makes them walk
void Mob::SendPosUpdate(int8 iSendToSelf) {
	EQApplicationPacket* app = new EQApplicationPacket(OP_ClientUpdate, sizeof(PlayerPositionUpdateServer_Struct));
	PlayerPositionUpdateServer_Struct* spu = (PlayerPositionUpdateServer_Struct*)app->pBuffer;
	MakeSpawnUpdate(spu);
	if (iSendToSelf == 2) {
		if (this->IsClient())
			this->CastToClient()->FastQueuePacket(&app,false);
	}
	else
#ifdef PACKET_UPDATE_MANAGER
		entity_list.QueueManaged(this, app, (iSendToSelf==0),false);
#else
		entity_list.QueueCloseClients(this, app, (iSendToSelf==0), 400, NULL, false);
#endif
	safe_delete(app);
}
I also slightly tweaked the update manager settings to be a little smaller and less frequent for mid range distances:

updatemgr.cpp
Code:
//squared distances for each level
//these values are pulled out of my ass, should be tuned some day
const float UpdateManager::level_distances2[UPDATE_LEVELS]
	= { 50*50, 250*250, 400*400, 600*600 };
	
//delay between sending packets in each level, in ms
//its best if they are all multiples of UPDATE_RESOLUTION
//these values are pulled out of my ass, should be tuned some day
const int32 UpdateManager::level_timers[UPDATE_LEVELS+1]
	= { UPDATE_RESOLUTION,		//.3s
		2*UPDATE_RESOLUTION, 	//.6s
		3*UPDATE_RESOLUTION,	//.9s
		12*UPDATE_RESOLUTION,	//~2s
		48*UPDATE_RESOLUTION	//~10s
	  };
And finally, I set my rule for the zonewide updates from 1 minute to 10 minutes. I really don't even know if we need zone wide updates at all. After these changes, so far the raids in Dreadspire which I was using as a reference for the lag issues have said that the lag is now completely gone. I still need to do more testing, but so far this is looking promising. We may not want these same settings across the board or anything, but certainly smaller closed in zones like dungeons should have the option to lower these settings.

I posted the code changes with colors because this isn't any sort of a final code submission. If I come up with anything that seems final, I will try to get it in the format that KLS is wanting. But, the code currently posted should help make it easier to discuss further steps.

Oh, an one idea I had that could potentially save me a TON of bandwidth was if I could disable position updates completely maybe by setting them to 0 for my server base zone which is Nexus. I only have 1 roaming NPC in there anyway, so if I stopped it from roaming, they wouldn't need position updates. And since that zone is almost always occupied by many AFK players, it would potentially save me a TON of bandwidth. Also, if we ever get the bazaar working, I think we should have similar options to help reduce bandwidth in there.
__________________
Trevazar/Trevius Owner of: Storm Haven
Everquest Emulator FAQ (Frequently Asked Questions) - Read It!

Last edited by trevius; 10-04-2008 at 11:21 PM..
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 10-06-2008, 11:28 AM
cubber
Discordant
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 374
Default

This sounds interesting but I have a few questions to think about.

1. If this despawns mobs that are not in a certian radius of the player then couldn't this approach be used as an exploit? If a player is trying to camp a named mob and the mob is not up, couldn't the player just venture out of the place holder's radius to despawn it? Triggering a respawn when they come back into it's radius, essentialy cycling the camp without killing anything? What about named mobs like CT that are only supposed to spawn on a schedual?

Or will the "despawned mob" basically be "cached" until it is revealed again, killed, or cycled by spawn timer?

2. What about respawn times in general? Could this be used to get around respawn times?

3. Also in comparison to WoW, I think that the spawn radius would have to be quite larger than what they impliment. It is quite annoying to be able to see a few hundred yards away but not see any mobs in that area until you are almost right on top of them.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

   

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:20 PM.


 

Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
EQEmulator is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Except where otherwise noted, this site is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
       
Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template by Bluepearl Design and vBulletin Templates - Ver3.3