Finished up the zone layout aside from the tree's basically which not sure what I'm doing with those currently. The mountains obviously need to be shaped more the placement orientation is where it should be at least. For now I'm cleaning up all the excess faces and deleting them, but after that not sure where to begin next.
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p...psebf3dfa2.png |
Random info about animations.
- Human, Half Elf, Dark Elf, High Elf, Erudite, and Barbarian use the ElfMale and ElfFemale animations depending on gender, with the exception of certain animations that they already have (e.g. the Barbarian Male and Female have different walk animations) - HumanMale has Walk, Run, and Idle animations that should be used instead of the ElfMale ones - ElfFemale has to Turn_01, so has to use the Turn_01 from ElfMale - Beetle uses Spider animations - LionFemale uses LionMale animations - Puma uses LionMale animations - Gnomes and Halflings use DwarfMale and DwarfFemale animations, with the exception of their own RunJump - OgreMale uses all the OgreFemale animations - TrollMale and TrollFemale use all the OgreFemale animations except for their own unique Walk and Run - BarbarianMale has unique Walk, Run, Idle animations, but uses ElfMale's animations for everything else - BarbarianFemale only has a unique Walk animation, but should use the BarbarianMale Run and Idle plus ElfFemale animations for everything else |
Deleted all the excess faces that I could find. Anyway some statistical information 32,920 verts with 27,510 faces. For comparisons temple of veeshan has 92,913 verts with 30,971 faces. Meanwhile guk bottom has 94,173 verts with 31,391 faces. It'll probably have a bit more faces and verts when it's done, but should be right in line with other zones so that's good to know.
I don't know if I can start to texture it now or if I should start shaping the terrain details height of jaggedness of mountains and the ground terrain. On a side note this wasn't too hard to develop what I've done so far the most challenging part was trying to keep the tiles accurate, but just take a map that size and doing it free hand how I want would be pretty simple and easy. I learned a fair amount of tricks with blender along the way as well which was nice feels a lot less foreign how to go about level design stuff. |
Starting work on all the terrain that juts in or out in spots to further improve both looks and accuracy a bit further. I'm not sure which method I should go with or perhaps even if I should do a cross between the two of them perhaps.
So with that said here's two different screen shots from the bottom corner section of the map. I wouldn't mind a little community input on which of the two people prefer the looks of more. In the mean while I'm gonna work on a hybrid prototype between the two to see how that looks as well. http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p...ps5b57e051.png http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p...psed911a00.png |
Here's what a hybrid between the two styles looks. Learning more and more 3D modeling techniques as I work on this and experiment with it a bit. I'm confident I could do my own free hand designs with far less difficulty than this replica challenge has been less room for personal stylization with this depending on how closely accurate you go for.
http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p...psdccdb022.png |
Hey Knowom. Would you mind posting new pictures in the OpenZone forum? Reason why I ask is because between the both of us, we've derailed the thread quite a bit with our massive screenshots. I'm probably the worst about this. :p
And I'm not trying to exercise any authority or anything (as I have none). Just a friendly request. :) We should save some room for those needing help. |
Yeah whenever the next update ends up being I'll make a new thread in OpenZone forum someplace. I actually wasn't sure on where to post about initially in regard to this stuff. It's not really OpenZone either, but along the same premise player developed zones which at it's heart is what OpenZone intentions were about.
|
Haven't been making any progress lately, but figured I'd put out what I have so far for the animated model tool I've been working on since it makes a decent EQG model and animation viewer. Link, src.
Can't save any kind of changes yet, only good for the viewer. Can press 's' in the viewer to display skeletons ('cept on the base pose), right and left arrow to cycle through animations, mouse buttons to move view around. Does not display a small number of models correctly (ones with alternate heads/pieces). There are one or two eqg files that will crash it, not sure why yet. Can view most EQG weapons correctly as well. |
Nice work Zaela!
Here is a link to a great 3d library i using in my projects: http://assimp.sourceforge.net/ It supports alot of 3d formats. For none programmers there is also a nice viewer for 3d models on the website. There also some api bindings for other language. "There is a C API as well as bindings to various other languages, including C#/.net, Python and D." Hope to see more of your nice work. |
Quote:
|
The model viewer now supports alternate "heads"/model parts (H key to cycle through them, if any) and texture sets (more or less -- T key to cycle through those).
I took a little time out to change how I was doing things a bit (LuaJIT's FFI is pretty nice) and re-wrote most of common code for my tools to be nicer. Should hopefully make it easier for me to expand and fix things in the future. Related to that, made a new version of my S3DSpy replacement which now has an "Export as PNG" option to convert DDS images coming out. Also fixed a bug where having an s3d or eqg file open in multiple tools at the same time (i.e. EQGExport + one of my importer tools) would make changes made in one tool overwrite those made in the other; EQGExport (and other tools, as I get to them) will now check if the s3d/eqg file has been modified and reload if necessary before doing any Export or Import operations. Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
EDIT: I might also inquire about the "Export as PNG" option. What becomes of the DDS image's alpha channel when this is done? I've found one of the biggest problems with converting DDS files manually to a more manageable format (always BMP in my case) is that an alpha layer can mess up the entire process unless I remember to remove it prior to conversion. Also, given that BMP is the standard format of pre-Luclin textures, is there an advantage to being able to instantly export PNG instead? |
Quote:
Quote:
I didn't have any particular use in mind when I added the PNG export option, I just know I get annoyed when I run into DDS files since I don't have anything to edit them with. There's no reason not to use PNG, at least, since EQ will load any of the common image formats for any purpose. I prefer to use PNG since BMP is a bit of a space-hog. |
I don't believe zlib comes preinstalled with any version of Windows.
You can easily download zlib1.dll from the official website and drop it into the same folder as the program that needs it, and everything should work fine. The current version is 1.2.8: http://zlib.net/zlib128-dll.zip Or you can always check the home page for the latest version: http://zlib.net/ |
Quote:
As for the difficulty of opening DDS, I see what you mean. I managed to find a plugin for GIMP that allows me to open them with relative ease, so I don't mind as much these days. There may be a similar plugin for your image editor of choice. :) Quote:
However, while I can get full use out of the Model Viewer, EQGExport still doesn't want to play nice. It simply opens, prompts for the S3D directory, populates the list of .s3d files, then does nothing further. I'm able to select a given .s3d file, but nothing comes up on the next column. Right-clicking does nothing. I may simply have to make do with v1.1 for the time being. Didn't mean to hijack Zaela's thread and turn it into a troubleshooting session! |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:28 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.