EQEmulator Forums

EQEmulator Forums (https://www.eqemulator.org/forums/index.php)
-   Misc::Off Topic (https://www.eqemulator.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=595)
-   -   all i have to say is... (https://www.eqemulator.org/forums/showthread.php?t=16123)

dark_one 09-30-2004 04:18 PM

all i have to say is...
 
http://www.jeffiscool.com/pictures/P...t_Football.jpg

rock on!

i think this post will prolly be moved but sill...

Gaan 09-30-2004 04:24 PM

it will be a 3 way tie because of "The Nader Effect"

Baron Sprite 09-30-2004 04:24 PM

bush is a fucking retard, anyone that votes for him should be fucking shot. give me your address if you vvote for him so I can kill you.

dark_one 09-30-2004 04:26 PM

dgdfsg
 
haha

well, as a fellow texan.....

ummm, err... *looks down at paper during speech* uhhhhh hmmm errr well... uhhhh hmmm errr but hmmm *cough* hmm

sotonin 09-30-2004 04:58 PM

They both suck ass, sorry but bush is better than retard kerry.

mattmeck 09-30-2004 04:59 PM

Bush = for the military
Kerry = against the military

Easy choice for me being a military family.

KhaN 09-30-2004 06:15 PM

Bush = Against the peace.
Kerry = For the peace.

Easy choice for me being a french.

On a more serious note, i live half in USA, i was in NYC during ground zero with my wife, i can trully understand how USA people was affected, but open your eyes and see that Bush is taking advantage of what happened during the 11 september to be elected.
Now im sure Bush will be elected again, and this is exactly what some islamic people with turbans are waiting for ...

daeken_bb 09-30-2004 10:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KhaN
Bush = Against the peace.
Kerry = For the peace.

Easy choice for me being a french.

On a more serious note, i live half in USA, i was in NYC during ground zero with my wife, i can trully understand how USA people was affected, but open your eyes and see that Bush is taking advantage of what happened during the 11 september to be elected.
Now im sure Bush will be elected again, and this is exactly what some islamic people with turbans are waiting for ...

I would have a lot less of an issue with Bush if he did two things:
1) Gives us reasonable reasons to attack countries, rather than putting everything under the guise of terrorism.
and 2) Stopps accusing Kerry of flip-flopping. People should hold firm to their core beliefs, but their ideas on what is going on in the world should be able to change. Being stuborn does nothing.

Either way, it's too flippin' early for me to get into a political conversation, so I'm out :P

Melwin 10-01-2004 12:20 AM

Off Topic.

Kerry is the lesser of two evils here.

dark_one 10-01-2004 12:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sotonin
They both suck ass, sorry but bush is better than retard kerry.


exactly how i see it :shock:

dark_one 10-01-2004 12:31 AM

oh and
 
darn i wish it would stay in eqemu cause no one scrolls way down here...



but who voted for nader? lol :?

Farrenz 10-01-2004 03:21 PM

Walter Brown for President!

Xabob 10-01-2004 03:32 PM

Nader lets all get high :D

RangerDown 10-01-2004 03:41 PM

It doesn't matter which way I vote.


No, it really doesn't. I'm in Texas so it's a no-brainer all the electoral votes here are going to Bush.

So, somebody tell me a good write-in candidate to use?

sotonin 10-01-2004 05:21 PM

Arnold Schwartzenegger =)

govtcheeze 10-01-2004 06:04 PM

Write in Deeznutz Onyachin...works for me

Cisyouc 10-02-2004 02:38 AM

Bush all the way. If we're attacked I don't know about you but I think its better for homeland security to defend ourselves instead of waiting years for the UN's support. :roll:

dark_one 10-02-2004 03:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cisyouc
Bush all the way. If we're attacked I don't know about you but I think its better for homeland security to defend ourselves instead of waiting years for the UN's support. :roll:

agree thx cisyouc

Melwin 10-02-2004 04:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cisyouc
Bush all the way. If we're attacked I don't know about you but I think its better for homeland security to defend ourselves instead of waiting years for the UN's support. :roll:

fyi you never need UN approval to defend yourself but good job on appealing to emotion out of ignorance nonetheless :O

dark_one 10-02-2004 05:34 AM

meh, the United Nations is only words anyways.... America Obviously didn't need their help, the media makes it seem like we lost the war in iraq when this one of the least amount of casualties for how long we've been there.

also, im sure this is the only war that our troops have been be-headed (bullshit)


America needs to accept that NO ONE likes them and just do things on their own... plus other countries complain about us when they have worse problems on hand.

so fuck off you hypocrite bastards (not melwin or wiz or anyone, im talking to the countries not specific people)

Scorpx725 10-02-2004 06:36 AM

Bonus points if you spell it right when writing it.

sotonin 10-02-2004 07:05 AM

Quote:

fyi you never need UN approval to defend yourself but good job on appealing to emotion out of ignorance nonetheless :O
if thats not a flame directed straight at cisyouc i dont know what is. How is it you don't apply to the forum rules? "out of ignorance"

Melwin 10-02-2004 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by sotonin
Quote:

fyi you never need UN approval to defend yourself but good job on appealing to emotion out of ignorance nonetheless :O
if thats not a flame directed straight at cisyouc i dont know what is. How is it you don't apply to the forum rules? "out of ignorance"

Stating a fact that is not a matter of opinion (whether or not someone is a mature adult is an example of something that is a matter of opinion) is not the same as what you did.

The definition of ignorance is not knowing. He was not aware that you did not require UN approval to defend yourself; therefore ignorance. Feel free to postulate any undeniable truths however you want, but when they are subjective, they easily descend into flaming or trolling.

I hope that clears it up for you. :)

Edgar1898 10-02-2004 08:46 AM

Quote:

So, somebody tell me a good write-in candidate to use?
LethalEncounter for president! :)

Edgar1898 10-02-2004 08:55 AM

Quote:

He was not aware that you did not require UN approval to defend yourself; therefore ignorance. Feel free to postulate any undeniable truths however you want, but when they are subjective, they easily descend into flaming or trolling.
Actually, I believe he was referring to our invasion of Iraq, which we didnt get UN support. I say any country that doesnt support our country shouldnt expect our support. That includes the billions we spent on financial aid. Its a two way street, country X doesnt like or support us, we dont support country X. If they are invaded by another country, just let the UN and France take care of it :roll:

Melwin 10-02-2004 09:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edgar1898
Actually, I believe he was referring to our invasion of Iraq, which we didnt get UN support. I say any country that doesnt support our country shouldnt expect our support. That includes the billions we spent on financial aid. Its a two way street, country X doesnt like or support us, we dont support country X. If they are invaded by another country, just let the UN and France take care of it :roll:

He was clearly referencing a hypothetical situation.

I agree with you apart from that.

Edit: Unless you actually happen to be one of the elusive people who still think Iraq was a threat to the US, in which case I'd love to hear your argumentation in favor of it :O

Memener 10-02-2004 05:05 PM

Quote:

but who voted for nader? lol

I did i was the frist Person to vote for him...

I never Liked Karry. Was going to vote for bush an-tell that BS prisoner Thing...

... See a whole lot of yall Dont know whats going on... What really goes on and why..


Well this is the end of my pointless reply....

dark_one 10-02-2004 06:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edgar1898
Quote:

So, somebody tell me a good write-in candidate to use?
LethalEncounter for president! :)


Cough?

edit: in a good way

Shadow-Wolf 10-03-2004 08:27 AM

Lethal for the win!

Cisyouc 10-03-2004 10:42 AM

Quote:

fyi you never need UN approval to defend yourself but good job on appealing to emotion out of ignorance nonetheless :O
You can't possibly tell me that we have to pass a "Global Test" (Kerry's Words) in order to defend ourselves.

joshuaes 10-03-2004 10:53 AM

nothing against either one of the candidates. but they both SUCK. i just vote kerry cause after i saw fahrenheight 9/11. bush's credibility went down. not saying i believe it though... but it's just opinion.

mattmeck 10-03-2004 02:40 PM

Quote:

i just vote kerry cause after i saw fahrenheight 9/11. bush's credibility went down.
ROFL now thats funny!!!!!

That was so full of out right lies it should have been Kerry making it :lol:

Edgar1898 10-03-2004 03:03 PM

This has nothing to do with his politics, but I HATE michael moore. That bastard is one of the few people that I outright hate. That "documentary", a term which I use loosely in this case, wasnt out to tell the truth, it was made to bend the truth to fit his (moore's) agenda.

BTW for all you people thinking about voting for Kerry:
http://www.rightnation.us/forums/ind...52639&st=0

That page (if true) shows Kerry commited a number of crimes, including Treason. Whatever you think of the candidates, Bush is the lesser of true evils.

Melwin 10-03-2004 03:03 PM

Changing your opinion based on anything Michael Moore has said or done should be illegal.

And Lethal, you should know better than to trust a site named "RightNation.us". Guess who it's biased against ;)

Edit: And on further inspection, my suspicions that the post in question contained no evidence whatsoever to back up its claims were confirmed. Big surprise.

Edgar1898 10-03-2004 03:08 PM

Or this one as well:

http://www.lesjones.com/posts/001213.shtml

These are far more relevent than some fat ass's "documentary"

Melwin 10-03-2004 03:38 PM

Internet blogs and forum posts are the definition of credibility.

http://humme.dk/img/psyduck.gif

Edgar1898 10-03-2004 03:48 PM

and some fat ass's "documentary" is yours?

ltlruss 10-03-2004 04:17 PM

This is all I got to say
http://www.coxandforkum.com/archives...eLoserIs-X.gif

Melwin 10-04-2004 10:05 AM

Where'd you get that idea, Lethal?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Melwin
Changing your opinion based on anything Michael Moore has said or done should be illegal.


Muuss 10-04-2004 07:26 PM

Khan :
Quote:

Bush = Against the peace.
Kerry = For the peace.

Easy choice for me being a french.
Speak for yourself, sir :)
Bush is far from being totally unapproved in France. As example, here at work (in a University, lair of the socialism in France!), at least 20 to 30% of the people would vote for him if they could !:)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.