Lucid Zek server ... not by SOE and not EQemu?
I saw this tread over on the sk boards that I still troll from time to time...what is this server?
http://www.shadowknight.org/forums/s...threadid=21446 |
The only thing that makes that server "not affliated with EQEMu" is the fact that they don't use EQEMus login server.
They're basically using a program between minilogin and "our" public login that assigns accounts by their IP and not their user/passsword (Lucid Vision didn't crack the encryption). Anyone can write such a "login server". Lucid Vision still uses all of the EQEMu code (with customizations, of couse). |
I just want to say that their code rocks and they've done some great work. If you're into PvP, that server is going to be hard to beat...
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
And if its the official version, i will say that no one is stupid enought to go in its company office to make publicity about its newly created company, you have chance to fired. |
http://www.lucid-vision.org/phpBB2/index.php
Link to their forums. Standing with two years of RZ behind me and two more years of SZ on top of that, and a summer on the original GuildWars (and GM-ing there), they are doing PvP right. Did they get their stuff from EQEmu? Duh yeah. Ever heard of HackersQuest? Probably not, because y'all are newbs and only just now jumped on the whole emulation thing, this isn't brand new its just finally in the last year or so gotted refined. Judging from the only reference I have found to EQEmu made by a GM of LZ, basically their position is that EQEmu gave them the middle finger, but they are cool with EQEmu. So really I don't know what gives. They have got a few guys who seem to know what they are doing, and a server capable of being a server (holding a hundred people in the zone, not just on the whole server - and this is happening). Nothing they are doing is meant to tear down EQEmu, so I'm not sure why folks over here are getting so peeved about it: don't try to tear them down. If you don't like it pass on, but man read up on their stuff, what is there to complain about? |
Have you ever realized EQEMU works far better and has far more features than Hackersquest, and hasn't been around as long? So really, who is the newb?
|
Congratulations.
Of course EQEmu is far past whatever HackersQuest was, but if it wasn't for HQ, where would EQEmu be today? |
The HQ emulator Blows right now, probably always will, they don't have enough people working on the emulator, all the people on HQ are working on trainers for eqlive, so the emulator is full of collision errors, and they haven't fixed them in the last 2 months.
Quote:
i don't think anyone ever said they were trying to tear down eqemu, and i also don't believe anyone is "peeved" about them using eqemu code, if the devs are upset i mean, it is an open source project...right? Edit: if you ever decied to play on this server watch out for people who could be devs/gm's just playing normal, they give themselves custom items named after some of the people who host the server and you will get raped, i read this from a post, i didn't actually experience it, but just an fyi to anyone who is thinking of trying to play it. Edit2.. this guy needs to be shot for his avatar. http://www.lucid-vision.org/phpBB2/p...iewprofile&u=2 |
Not sure what put you in the defensive Kambic, scrolling back nobody said anything to tear down the folks at LV. In fact, I think all the comments on the server in this thread have been positive and agreed with your statements about it being a positive server.
Due to my question about the login server part it sparked a side discussion on the login server process and how they could be doing it without using the eqemu loginservers. There may have been some negatives posting about the way they are doing the process, but hey, they have it working and if it works for them great but others may not like it for themselves. At any rate, was just kinda shocked by your response and couldn't find anything that would prompt such a defensive stance. |
Quote:
|
I probably misinterpreted some of Khan's posts. And maybe just the in-general lack of LZ info.
And re-reading mine it does come off as uber defensive heh. I am not sure how many of you played GW, but I did and now looking at LZ it just seems like GW finally done right and knowing the previous GW people and their "its free take our BS" attitudes, I at least foresee some angst coming from that department (I suppose not the primary EQEmu userbase). |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:28 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.