EQEmulator Forums - Debian 64 Errors since last build

EQEmulator Forums (https://www.eqemulator.org/forums/index.php)

- Support::Linux Servers (https://www.eqemulator.org/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=588)

- - Debian 64 Errors since last build (https://www.eqemulator.org/forums/showthread.php?t=37178)

Debian 64 Errors since last build

Back in April I upgraded my server with no issues. I know a lot has changed in the compile methods since the last time I did the upgrade. Doing searches through the forum and google are not coming up with anything I was not already familiar with. I am not even choosing LUA during the CMake process, nor BOTS just yet until I can get a compile to run.

Code:

[  0%] Building CXX object common/CMakeFiles/Common.dir/BasePacket.cpp.o

In file included from /home/jkg/eq1/common/BasePacket.cpp:19:

/home/eq1/common/BasePacket.h: In constructor âBasePacket::BasePacket()â:

/home/eq1/common/BasePacket.h:82: error: ânullptrâ was not declared in this scope

/home/eq1/common/BasePacket.cpp: In constructor âBasePacket::BasePacket(const unsigned char*, uint32)â:

/home/eq1/common/BasePacket.cpp:27: error: ânullptrâ was not declared in this scope

/home/eq1/common/BasePacket.cpp: In destructor âvirtual BasePacket::~BasePacket()â:

/home/eq1/common/BasePacket.cpp:47: error: ânullptrâ was not declared in this scope

make[2]: *** [common/CMakeFiles/Common.dir/BasePacket.cpp.o] Error 1

make[1]: *** [common/CMakeFiles/Common.dir/all] Error 2

make: *** [all] Error 2

What version of GCC are you using?

Quote:

Originally Posted by lerxst2112 (Post 223408)

What version of GCC are you using?

gcc version 4.4.5 (Debian 4.4.5-8)

And also in case people are wondering....

Code:

root@EqEmu-devel:~# cat /etc/debian_version

6.0.3

4.4.5 is 3 years old. Might want to try and upgrade. The current version is 4.8.1.

My CentOS is enterprise standard which still sits at 4.4. I'd rather define a nullptr than upgrade. That's why I left the issue open in GIT.

Well, proper nullptr support is more than just a define. But, your choice.

Oh, understood very much... thus the open issue :)