View Single Post
  #12  
Old 11-04-2006, 04:47 PM
KLS
Administrator
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,348
Default

Yeah the problem was 2 fold really, mostly inexperience with how haste was handled with bonuses by me, and no one really caught it when I submitted it to review. Essentially every haste was being calculated at (hasted%+100%) so a -30% slow was really a 70% haste cause of my screw up. And my code didn't totally overlooked slows when comparing it to the base value of 0(lol).
Reply With Quote