[quote father nitwit] to follow on to the previous thread, making items with arbitrarily high IDs like that is really not a good idea... we have a static length array to make item management fast and big gaps in item IDs waste a lot of memory (if it works at all)[/quote]
Eeep! Looks like its true, at least for some of the table data.
Well, we know for sure that item IDs really, really need to stay down low. Time to start checking the database and re-numbering those 180K+ numbers.
I wonder if this might be a source of some of the tradeskill and other item related problems people have been having.
|