[a_Guest03]

This absolutely contradicts what I found on Lucy! :( I apply the monkly equations to Lucy data, and they don't match at all.

I would be satisfied with the data that currently exists on monkly business. I think that model is a more fair representation of the melee classes anyway.

The following equations are offered for weapon damage bonus:

1 handed weapons, including fists, and will include bash and kick, if I am correct:

TRUNCATE((LEVEL-25)/3)

2 handed weapons:

You will notice that many of these equations are modifications of the one-handed weapon equation, and equations listed below.

LIGHT WEAPONS
- Weapons with delays less than 28

1 + TRUNCATE((LEVEL-25)/3)
shorthand: 1hb equation + 1

MEDIUM WEAPONS
- Weapons with delays between and including 28 and 39

TRUNCATE((LEVEL-25)/3) + (LEVEL-27)/4)
shorthand: Light weapons equation - 1 + TRUNCATE((LEVEL-27)/4)

SLOW WEAPONS
- Weapons with delays between and including 40 and 42

TRUNCATE((LEVEL-25)/3) + (LEVEL-27)/4) + 1)
- shorthand: Medium weapons equation + 1

VERY SLOW WEAPONS
- Weapons with delays greater than 42

TRUNCATE((LEVEL-25)/3) + (LEVEL-27)/4) + (DELAY-34)/3) + 1)
- shorthand: Slow weapons equation + TRUNCATE((DELAY-34)/3)

I think these are probably the real values. If they aren't, the equations are so easy compared to the difficult ones, that we should probably follow these instead. I trust Lucy, but I also trust monkly. Let's go with the one that we can do. More to come.