Quote:
|
Originally Posted by a_Guest03
The U.S. had legal rights to attack Iraq. They were violating their U.N. resolution, and we had every right to attack them.
|
that doesnt give the US the right to start a war,
its the UN's thing to sort out. And since Bush doesnt
seem to give a flying fuck about what the UN says
he shouldnt go berserk when Saddam's not keeping his word.
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Merth
Would you make the same argument with Al-Qaeda in the pre-9/11 years? If we had known about their capability prior to that day, should we have sat on our ass and waited for the UN to pass something?
|
at 9/11 Al-Qaeda were the aggressors, and US would have all the right to strike them down... but now the US is interfearing with other peoples deals and so on...
they think that just because the UN has a resolution, and Saddam is breaking it, they can bust his balls...
ITS not Bush's job to be some kind of a hitman...