|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General::News::Polls Polls for the front page. |
View Poll Results: Favorite Server Type
|
PvP Only
|
|
226 |
8.05% |
Mostly PvP, Some PvE
|
|
216 |
7.69% |
PvE, Optional PvP
|
|
1,111 |
39.55% |
PvE Only
|
|
1,256 |
44.71% |
09-11-2009, 06:41 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 708
|
|
Favorite Server Type
Which will it be!
__________________
EQEmulator Developer / Administrator
|
09-12-2009, 03:41 AM
|
Fire Beetle
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 27
|
|
pvp ftw!
|
09-13-2009, 01:57 PM
|
Hill Giant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: in your closet....
Posts: 169
|
|
pve with optional pvp is nice.
__________________
a hill giant slashes YOU for 25 points of damage!
You have been slain!
LOADING, PLEASE WAIT...
|
09-13-2009, 05:14 PM
|
Sarnak
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 89
|
|
ditto big R!
as much as i love eq i had a great deal of fun back in the day with Dark Age of Camelot's pve/pvp segregation system.
|
09-16-2009, 06:46 PM
|
Fire Beetle
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 27
|
|
What exactly is optional PvP? Like the priest of discord or something? In my limited experience in the area, most people I've seen do not go PK on normal servers.
|
09-16-2009, 10:16 PM
|
|
Administrator
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 708
|
|
optional would be like.. the main object is the server is advancement through pve, but there would be certain zones that are pvp enabled.
Might make a server that is PvE / PvP Optional, have a lot of ideas I'v been thinking up lately.
__________________
EQEmulator Developer / Administrator
|
09-16-2009, 10:17 PM
|
|
Demi-God
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Umm
Posts: 1,492
|
|
optional PvP could mean that:
-people could challenge each other to duel
-special zones declared as PvP zones
in other words its not an automatic PvP, and you do not have to participate if you don't want to - kind of like normal WoW server, minus the forceful separation into H and A (stupid idea btw)
|
12-02-2009, 05:50 AM
|
Fire Beetle
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: ABQ
Posts: 28
|
|
All the "blue" servers back in the day were pve/pvp optional. the nameless was.
__________________
Now and then we had a hope that if we lived and were good, God would permit us to be pirates.
- Life on the Mississippi
"And don't they wear the bulliest clothes! Oh no! All gold and silver and di'monds," said Joe, with enthusiasm.
- The Adventures of Tom Sawyer
|
01-11-2010, 09:49 PM
|
Fire Beetle
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Yee
Posts: 4
|
|
Nice pve/pvp idea
A sick idea would be pve all around, except the only zones with pvp enable are zones with bigger raid bosses. IE SSRA, BOT, Elementals, Kael, VT, VP, ToV etc. This way the higher end guilds wont be like "Man, those guys have been sitting there for 20 hours camping this spawn :("
it will entice more utter chaos, without all of the /ragequit
|
01-23-2010, 09:45 PM
|
Fire Beetle
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 26
|
|
I've been dieing for one...
|
03-11-2010, 01:09 AM
|
Fire Beetle
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 6
|
|
"Club Zek" is in beta and is going to have dungeons and planes flagged for pvp with a xp bonus as well.
More info about it here - http://clubzek.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7
|
05-03-2010, 08:20 PM
|
Fire Beetle
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1
|
|
Full pvp was the best. Rallos was cool till all the gear went to no drop then it was pointless. I played primarily on Vallon, then Sullon. Sullon to me was the ultimate server, full pvp, no safe zones, no level limits, no GMs. Survival of the fittest EQ style. I hope to find something that is close here in the EMU servers, or at least a decent pvp server. No other game has really come close to EQ for the state of paranoia we had back in the day on a pvp server which totally adds a new level to the game.
/who all every 5 seconds to see who is in zone is still burned into me and automatic.
|
06-03-2010, 08:12 PM
|
Fire Beetle
|
|
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NE Texas
Posts: 1
|
|
I like the PVE w/ PVP optional. I did play on Rallos, but got tired of the corpse campers. My other prob w/ most of the so called "PVP"ers is that it tends to be P's V P. 2, 3 or more friends ganging up against 1 (usually lower level) person. I am all for 1-on-1 about equal level to test your real fighting skills, but that is not the way it seems to work out.
|
08-14-2010, 03:07 PM
|
Fire Beetle
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: TN
Posts: 2
|
|
Optional pvp = "/" when you zone in =)
|
08-19-2010, 07:48 AM
|
Fire Beetle
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SoFla, USA
Posts: 25
|
|
I've had Enough problems with PK'ers on several other games online. Having the main part being PvE with the PvP being optional in my opinion is the best of all. Having one or more rectums camping a chokepoint JUST to kill other players, usually without warning, is a total game spoiler for me.
__________________
Reya{CLR}, Zandir{PAL}, Sholi{RNG}, Tadwe{ENC}, Mghargh{WAR}
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:36 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|