Anyone play a half elf, ranger?

[TwinkleToes]

I seem to be really bored playing a half elf ranger know. Takes to long to go to different zones hehe. Anyone else play one? If not is a wood elf better as for zones that is etc. thanks :juggle:

[danipunk]

in some servers you can use
#zone (name zone) to travel to the name zone you put .
It is very useful command.

[TwinkleToes]

yes I know that, can not do that on the server I am on I'm on a Uber Legit Server! :)

[BlissBoi]

Honestly, Half elf rangers r much better rangers, But for some reason, No one see's a midget holding a bow hehe, They see a woodelf, with his ears pointy, and eyes focusing, cant imagine something else, so thats why you see so much woodelf rangers, they look kewl, and there decent.

[Farrenz]

Rangers suck in general...why bother.

[Trumpcard]

Maybe we should all just play necromancers...

Wouldnt that be fun, we'll eliminate all other classes becauses necromancers are the only ones that don't suck.. We can eliminate all the weapons and armor too that suck so everything thats left are 50/10 weapons, and 70+AC armor pieces..

And we can make all the mobs have 5 hitpoints, that way we'll always win a fight...

[boucoune]

ranger rock but not Half elf . h

[BlissBoi]

lol you guys r on crack, Rangers suck?!.... Ok thats where you become stupid, In a duel a bow always wins. And they can use 2 weaps... In live I had a 65 ranger b4 i sold the account, He had 146aa's.. And dont tell me they suck, I hit for 400 with my bow ez, and critted around 1000-1500. Thats awesome for dueling, snare, root, dd, bow. 10% melee.


Pfft.. lol

[Jeremax]

Nobody will believe you if you talk like that. ..--..

[Oumadar]

No hes right, rangers do suck. Just step against a wall and a ranger can't hit you with their bow.

[Master Shake]

Halfers are good bards