Go Back   EQEmulator Home > EQEmulator Forums > General > General::General Discussion

General::General Discussion General discussion about EverQuest(tm), EQEMu, and related topics.
Do not post support topics here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old Yesterday, 10:00 PM
Belvue
Fire Beetle
 
Join Date: Mar 2026
Posts: 2
Default Ascendant EQ Server - Read before investing serious time

I am posting this because Ascendant EQ’s handling of a privately reported exploit raises serious concerns about staff conduct, public narrative control, and whether players can safely report server-breaking issues without being mocked or mischaracterized afterward.

For transparency, I am the player who was permanently banned after the incident. I am not asking EQEmulator staff to reverse that ban or adjudicate Ascendant’s player discipline. My concern is how the exploit report was handled and how the situation was later represented publicly.

I discovered a serious platinum-generation issue involving bridle / stable-hand behavior and reported it privately to senior staff. The report included screenshots, item context, suspected economy impact, reproduction details, and an itemized log.

Afterward, the admin publicly reduced the situation to “caught cheating,” used Discord to mock me, and promoted a version of events that omits the private report history.

The concern is not whether Ascendant staff can ban a player. The concern is whether it is acceptable for server staff to receive a private exploit report, then publicly minimize the report, mock the reporter, and redirect the issue into a simplified player misconduct narrative.

Additional issue reports were dismissed as spam or “ChatGPT spam” because they were formatted with AI assistance. That criticism is especially strange given that Ascendant’s own GitHub appears to use AI tooling for server development and administration. Formatting assistance does not invalidate the underlying technical issues.

This was not public OOC drama. It was a private report about an economy-impacting exploit. Instead of treating that report as a serious server-integrity issue, staff used the situation to fault the player and avoid addressing the broader release, validation, and exploit-handling concerns.

That creates a bad incentive structure. If players believe serious reports will be mocked, selectively summarized, or used against them publicly, the rational move becomes staying silent.

The issue reports were formatted clearly so staff could review them. Dismissing the format does not make the underlying problems disappear.

In addition, Ascendant appears to operate a donation platform tied to server costs, despite EQEmulator’s strict non-commercial requirements. Their public support page solicits donations for hosting, operations, maintenance, tooling, and development while also claiming no revenue is derived from the project. If that is not covered by a written exception, it appears to create a separate compliance risk.

Players considering Ascendant should be aware of the pattern:

- Serious exploit reported privately
- Report history minimized or omitted publicly
- Reporter mocked by staff
- Additional technical reports dismissed based on format
- Server-side implementation issues reframed as player misconduct
- Donation language that appears difficult to reconcile with EQEmulator’s non-commercial policy

I am not asking anyone to take my word for it blindly. I have screenshots of the original private report, staff responses, public discussion, the donation page, and the relevant policy language.

Players should also understand that this is not just internal server drama. Ascendant’s public donation setup may create a broader compliance risk for the server itself.

The EQEmulator Terms state that Daybreak may request modification or termination of any EQEmulator server, and that EQEmulator may disable, delist, or permanently remove a server if it determines the server violates the Terms or applicable law. The Terms also state that Daybreak is an intended third-party beneficiary and may assert legal claims if the agreement is breached.

Ascendant’s public support page solicits Ko-fi donations, displays server runway/funding status, and ties community support to server operation. That appears difficult to reconcile with EQEmulator’s non-commercial requirements, its prohibition on indirect revenue/donation facilitation, and the requirement that operators are responsible for their own server costs.

That means players investing time here may be exposed to avoidable continuity risk created by the operator’s own policy decisions. If EQEmulator or Daybreak reviews the donation structure and determines it violates the Terms, the server could face delisting, restriction, forced modification, or shutdown.

My warning is simple: before investing serious time into Ascendant EQ, understand how staff may handle exploit reports, technical concerns, and public narratives when the issue reflects poorly on server operations.It may also have operator-created compliance risk that could affect whether the server remains listed or available.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old Yesterday, 11:17 PM
Straps
Fire Beetle
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Posts: 7
Default

A Warm Welcome to Ascendant EQ

Ascendant is a custom EQEmu server built for players who love EQ, progression, discovery, and community-driven development. We have custom content, active updates, quality-of-life improvements, and now, apparently, a platinum-generation exploit appellate court.

For clarity:

Reporting an exploit is good.
Privately reporting an exploit is good.
Providing reproduction steps is good.

Generating and spending tons of illicit platinum from that exploit and then acting like the Pulitzer Prize for Bug Reporting should override the ban hammer is... less good.

We actively protect the economy, have tons of active traders, and we appreciate players who help protect the server economy.

When it comes to people abusing bugs, we do not accept:
  • "I was only stress-testing the economy."
  • "It was a private exploit report, Your Honor."
  • "ChatGPT formatted my confession, therefore it is enterprise-grade."
  • "Stable-hand arbitrage is legitimate gameplay."

Ascendant is a free, fan-run, non-commercial project. Any community support goes toward keeping the lights on, not selling power, items, progression, or advantage. We are actively progressing, have very active GM's & Guides, and a ton of very helpful players. (now minus one toxic player)

So if you’re looking for a fun, active, custom EverQuest server, you’re welcome here.

Bring your friends.
Bring your feedback.
Bring your bug reports.

Just maybe don’t bring a wheelbarrow full of exploit platinum and then ask to be treated like a whistleblower.

https://ascendanteq.com/
https://discord.gg/VEnMPKsrAF
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

   

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:10 PM.


 

Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
EQEmulator is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Except where otherwise noted, this site is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
       
Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template by Bluepearl Design and vBulletin Templates - Ver3.3