|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
Development::Database/World Building World Building forum, dedicated to the EQEmu MySQL Database. Post partial/complete databases for spawns, items, etc. |
View Poll Results: Which version MySql do you use for your server?
|
I use MySQL 4.0 or less
|
  
|
6 |
7.23% |
I use MySql 4.1 and up, but less than MySql5x
|
  
|
14 |
16.87% |
I use MySql 5.0 or higher
|
  
|
63 |
75.90% |

02-06-2007, 10:20 AM
|
AX Classic Developer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: filler
Posts: 2,049
|
|
Poll who uses which MySQl?
Would like to see how much MySql5 is in use already. or who still uses 4
|

02-06-2007, 01:45 PM
|
 |
The PEQ Dude
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: -
Posts: 1,988
|
|
You should have an I use all 3 options for weirdos like me 
|

02-06-2007, 02:36 PM
|
AX Classic Developer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: filler
Posts: 2,049
|
|
Looks like MySql5 is loosing ground! Darn, I gambled a lot of money there ...
|

02-06-2007, 02:38 PM
|
AX Classic Developer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: filler
Posts: 2,049
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cavedude
You should have an I use all 3 options for weirdos like me 
|
I've had all three and just had 4.0 and 5.0 tell the other day.
|

02-06-2007, 02:53 PM
|
 |
The PEQ Dude
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: -
Posts: 1,988
|
|
Replied for PEQ. As for myself, I have a 4.1 server and a 5.0. Personally, I actually like the 4.1 better. Seems to outperform 5.0 on my servers.
|

02-07-2007, 02:30 AM
|
Demi-God
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,552
|
|
So far, my 4.1 on Linux smokes the pants off anything I ever tried on Windoze. I think 5.x, while newer and more fancy, is also slower because of the fatness being added. Good fatness, nonetheless.
|

02-07-2007, 03:45 AM
|
 |
The PEQ Dude
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: -
Posts: 1,988
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Adams
So far, my 4.1 on Linux smokes the pants off anything I ever tried on Windoze. I think 5.x, while newer and more fancy, is also slower because of the fatness being added. Good fatness, nonetheless.
|
I agree 100%
|

02-07-2007, 12:08 PM
|
AX Classic Developer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: filler
Posts: 2,049
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Adams
So far, my 4.1 on Linux smokes the pants off anything I ever tried on Windoze. I think 5.x, while newer and more fancy, is also slower because of the fatness being added. Good fatness, nonetheless.
|
Lol - that's ok , just so long as you voted for 5.0, and made the bar fatter too 
|

02-12-2007, 02:15 AM
|
Discordant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 394
|
|
Believe it or not, I've had the best results (under linux anyway) with mysql 5.x vs. 4.x
I know you target 4.x still, but 5.x is just a better overall experience for me. Less problems across the board.
|

02-14-2007, 05:59 AM
|
AX Classic Developer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: filler
Posts: 2,049
|
|
I made this thread sticky, and gave it a mild "bump" see if we can't get in some more votes 
|

02-14-2007, 09:36 AM
|
Discordant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Subsection 185.D354 C.12
Posts: 346
|
|
When I started mySQL it was a 4.1. I needed it because PHPbb2 wouldn't accept any thing newer. Then a few months later they did. MySQL 5 is for me the most.
In 4.1 the Admin tool would load tables faster and didn't have an extra table on install. However the quary tool runs faster on 5 when building results.
MySQL 5 - The Way it's mean to be stored!
__________________
If at first you don't succeed destroy all evidence that you ever tried.
God doesn't give second chances... Hell, he sets you up the first time.
|

02-14-2007, 10:02 AM
|
 |
The PEQ Dude
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: -
Posts: 1,988
|
|
MS Access ftw.
|

02-14-2007, 05:18 PM
|
Discordant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Subsection 185.D354 C.12
Posts: 346
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cavedude
MS Access ftw.
|
I don't know if I should laugh or hate you...
__________________
If at first you don't succeed destroy all evidence that you ever tried.
God doesn't give second chances... Hell, he sets you up the first time.
|

03-08-2007, 10:08 AM
|
Discordant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 394
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cavedude
MS Access ftw.
|
HAHA!
As if Access was a database proggie or something? 
__________________
--
Keelyeh
Owner, ServerOp and Developer
Jest 4 Server
Linux (Jest3 runs on Fedora, our Dev servers usually run on Ubuntu and/or Gentoo), OC-12 Connection = Hella Fast
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 AM.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |