|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 |
|
| Development::Database/World Building World Building forum, dedicated to the EQEmu MySQL Database. Post partial/complete databases for spawns, items, etc. |
|
View Poll Results: Which version MySql do you use for your server?
|
|
I use MySQL 4.0 or less
|
   
|
6 |
7.23% |
|
I use MySql 4.1 and up, but less than MySql5x
|
  
|
14 |
16.87% |
|
I use MySql 5.0 or higher
|
  
|
63 |
75.90% |
02-06-2007, 02:38 PM
|
|
AX Classic Developer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: filler
Posts: 2,049
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cavedude
You should have an I use all 3 options for weirdos like me  |
I've had all three and just had 4.0 and 5.0 tell the other day. |
02-06-2007, 02:53 PM
|
 |
The PEQ Dude
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: -
Posts: 1,988
|
|
Replied for PEQ. As for myself, I have a 4.1 server and a 5.0. Personally, I actually like the 4.1 better. Seems to outperform 5.0 on my servers.
|
02-07-2007, 02:30 AM
|
|
Demi-God
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,552
|
|
So far, my 4.1 on Linux smokes the pants off anything I ever tried on Windoze. I think 5.x, while newer and more fancy, is also slower because of the fatness being added. Good fatness, nonetheless.
|
02-07-2007, 03:45 AM
|
|
The PEQ Dude
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: -
Posts: 1,988
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by John Adams
So far, my 4.1 on Linux smokes the pants off anything I ever tried on Windoze. I think 5.x, while newer and more fancy, is also slower because of the fatness being added. Good fatness, nonetheless.
|
I agree 100% |
02-07-2007, 04:44 AM
|
|
The PEQ Dude
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: -
Posts: 1,988
|
|
Let me just clarify.
I do agree MySQL 5.0 would be best to migrate to. Not so much for the features but for the fact that it is an active project and not obsolete. EQEmu needs to move forward.
However, I have to admit MySQL 4.1 is faster and uses less resources than 5.0. I won't hide that fact and tell everybody 5.0 is better in every way when it isn't.
As for 4.0, well it lacks the features of the above and also is slower than both. I voted for it because that is what PEQ runs, atm. It's obsolete unsupported software. HOWEVER, I do not want it to be forgotten at first. If a migration to 5.0 takes place, I do not want EQEmu to change to prevent use of 4.0 or 4.1. It should be backwards compatible, for at least the first year or so. Likewise, when 5.1 and 5.2 and so forth are out, I do not want 5.0 forgotten about. People deserve a choice.
|
02-07-2007, 12:08 PM
|
|
AX Classic Developer
|
|
Join Date: May 2006
Location: filler
Posts: 2,049
|
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by John Adams
So far, my 4.1 on Linux smokes the pants off anything I ever tried on Windoze. I think 5.x, while newer and more fancy, is also slower because of the fatness being added. Good fatness, nonetheless.
|
Lol - that's ok , just so long as you voted for 5.0, and made the bar fatter too  |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 PM.
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
 |
