MiniLogin decompiled/cracked

[Secrets]

Originally Posted by Lalolyen

No... That just made sense of the unpacking =)

I kind of doubt it when a quick google search can produce the same code you posted.

Reverse Engineering Decompiler

Also, that doesn't compile. It just doesn't. It produces a C-like code, so you know what's going on when reverse engineering. If you really wanna get the source code, watch packets with Wireshark, dump the packets, create a program which can interpret the packets, because as doodman said, they arn't encrypted.

Simple as that, you need to code from ground up. If you wanna do that? Good for you, just respect other's wishes. I hate when people think they are badass over the internet, especially admins/sysops, because chances are they arn't trustworthy.

[Lalolyen]

Originally Posted by Secrets

I kind of doubt it when a quick google search can produce the same code you posted.

Reverse Engineering Decompiler

Also, that doesn't compile. It just doesn't. It produces a C-like code, so you know what's going on when reverse engineering. If you really wanna get the source code, watch packets with Wireshark, dump the packets, create a program which can interpret the packets, because as doodman said, they arn't encrypted.

You do know there is no "one" decompiler for cpp right? =S

The communications I agree is very open going to the login server. However just sniffing the signals and interpretors will not give you enough info to reconstruct the mini-login server as *caugh* the server gives different responses to some of the same things indicating some kind of custom hand-shake.

[Secrets]

Originally Posted by Lalolyen

You do know there is no "one" decompiler for cpp right? =S

I'm aware of that; It's just silly to go about this way.

You're threatening a community with a google search, pretty much.

[Lalolyen]

Originally Posted by Secrets

I'm aware of that; It's just silly to go about this way.

You're threatening a community with a google search, pretty much.

No... Most of the decompilers out there are searchable on Google, but this program does NOT decompile like you said.

Like you reiterated I said, it does make sense of the code after the disassemble.

Again find the threat, or are you one of those gullible and mentally challenged ones that easily falls to one word of slander?

[Secrets]

Originally Posted by Lalolyen

No... Most of the decompilers out there are searchable on Google, but this program does NOT decompile like you said.

Like you reiterated I said, it does make sense of the code after the disassemble.

As for it being decompiled, yeah, it is able to be decompiled. No question about that. What was the dev team supposed to do, asprotect it in 2000?

My point being, you posted something anyone can access, not an actual workable source. Hence it being the fabled decompiled minilogin, not the minilogin source.

If you want to impress us, don't try and reverse engineer minilogin, play by the rules and just help out on the project, and use that skill to progress the emulator. Surely there's some functions still to be found in eqgame, right?