SoF Development Tracking

Savnok · #1 07-30-2009, 04:21 AM

J&R Music World has copies (new) of SoF for $10.92 shipped. That is the best I could find currently and even beating the Ebay.
J&R is a fine fine company and you will get yor DVD. They have been around forver.
No I do not work for them ..life becoming a 24/7 Geico commercal for you? LOL, I know.

$10.92 shipped new DVD SoF copies. I am hearing this DVD is becomming extinct soon. Ouch

provocating · #2 07-30-2009, 08:40 AM

When I bought mine from NewEgg for $5 shipped, I almost ordered 3 or 4.

**Rogean** · #3 08-05-2009, 03:01 PM

Just deleted a message, keep in mind:

Quote:

Warez Is NOT Allowed
-This includes the transfer of any copyrighted material, including EQ Files and backpatches. Requesting files, even in a PM, will result in a ban.

Greyhelm · #4 08-05-2009, 03:04 PM

It was me. My apologies. Guess I should read the rules. Thanks.

thepoetwarrior · #5 08-08-2009, 09:35 AM

I got my copy on ebay brand new sealed for $5

**Derision** · #6 01-24-2010, 04:17 PM

Quote:

Medium Priority Work:
1. Stamina/Endurance - Stamina/Endurance does not regenerate properly and seems to drop when you zone. I believe this is because Live now sends endurance update packets and SoF probably does as well, but Titanium does not.

Is this still an issue ? If so, what exactly is the issue ?

I took a quick look yesterday and a warrior with the SoF client seemed to be regnerating endurance (the number the client showed didn't exactly match #showstats, but it didn't seem far out), and I didn't see endurance drop on zoning.

**trevius** · #7 01-24-2010, 09:59 PM

Yeah, it seems to have been corrected at some point and I don't know exactly when. It could have been fixing the consume packets or something else. I do think that SoF probably wants to get endurance update packets just like the health and mana updates, but it seems to be working ok without them as far as I can tell. If we see any more issues with it, we can always try adding an endurance update packet and see if that helps.

I finally messed with the encode/decode of the inspect packet for SoF again last night and got it working fine for SoF clients to inspect Titanium clients. I think I figured out why neither client can inspect SoF clients. I think they must have changed how it works since Titanium and now instead of the OP_InspectRequest going all the way from the inspector to the inspectee, I think it now just goes to the server and the server replies with the info instead of the inspectee replying. So packet handling would need to be able to build the reply packet if the inspectee is an SoF client.