Go Back   EQEmulator Home > EQEmulator Forums > Support > Support::Linux Servers

Support::Linux Servers Support forum for Linux EQEMu users.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-30-2012, 12:16 PM
Akkadius's Avatar
Akkadius
Administrator
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 2,072
Default

Querserv originated with the idea that I wanted to take logging events to not only Mysql but send them offsite if possible sort of like a syslog architecture. Right now Queryserv is in it's infancy but I would like to dual-home logging functionality for EITHER text logging or using QueryServ so that it can be used offsite and queried offsite via a web front-end and whatnot. I wanted to get combat logging, event logging and all kinds of other levels of logging pushed off to this and Derision just so happened to implement it with the LFGuild feature.

Rogean had something similar to this idea implemented for P1999 before I even thought of it but that is the premise in which I had been wanting to go with.

Does that help explain things a little bit?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-30-2012, 01:38 PM
Derision
Developer
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,540
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akkadius View Post
Querserv originated with the idea that I wanted to take logging events to not only Mysql but send them offsite if possible sort of like a syslog architecture. Right now Queryserv is in it's infancy but I would like to dual-home logging functionality for EITHER text logging or using QueryServ so that it can be used offsite and queried offsite via a web front-end and whatnot. I wanted to get combat logging, event logging and all kinds of other levels of logging pushed off to this and Derision just so happened to implement it with the LFGuild feature.
I didn't realise you intended queryserv to run 'off-site', I just saw it as a convenient way to:

a) Avoid making database calls in the main thread, which I hate, and using queryserv was easier than using the existing zone dbasync thread.
b) Avoid the issue of syncing data between zone processes, again without having to read/write the database in the main thread, when updates to that data could be made in any zone.

I could move the LFGuild stuff out of queryserv and back into zone, but I would want to put it into the async DB thread which would mean writing an easier to use interface to dbasync, which I have thought about off-and-on for a while and would be an interesting exercise.

Another option would be to allow for multiple queryserv processes. When a queryserv process connects, it would tell world which server opcodes it would handle, e.g. you could have a queryserv co-located with world/zones which would say, 'hey, send me all ServerOP_LFGuild packets', and an off-site one which would say, 'send me all logging packets'.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-30-2012, 01:43 PM
Secrets's Avatar
Secrets
Demi-God
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: b
Posts: 1,449
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Derision View Post
I didn't realise you intended queryserv to run 'off-site', I just saw it as a convenient way to:

a) Avoid making database calls in the main thread, which I hate, and using queryserv was easier than using the existing zone dbasync thread.
b) Avoid the issue of syncing data between zone processes, again without having to read/write the database in the main thread, when updates to that data could be made in any zone.

I could move the LFGuild stuff out of queryserv and back into zone, but I would want to put it into the async DB thread which would mean writing an easier to use interface to dbasync, which I have thought about off-and-on for a while and would be an interesting exercise.

Another option would be to allow for multiple queryserv processes. When a queryserv process connects, it would tell world which server opcodes it would handle, e.g. you could have a queryserv co-located with world/zones which would say, 'hey, send me all ServerOP_LFGuild packets', and an off-site one which would say, 'send me all logging packets'.
I'm a big fan of the second option honestly. That seems like a fair compromise. The reason to make queryserv was 1) performance in the main thread 2) Disk I/O as a result of many database queries on-site. 3) A place to put things that don't require immediate results from the database. 4) A 'hack' to use multiple processors by creating another executable.

By allowing different queryservs to connect (maybe like the loginserver does?) in different configs, that would work best, at least in my opinion. Can have a log.ini-style file that loads each 'option' for what the queryserv should handle. Have QueryServ set that on connecting.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-30-2012, 06:56 PM
provocating's Avatar
provocating
Demi-God
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,175
Default

Well I compiled QueryServ and it is running. Do I need to bounce the server for any reason ? QueryServ said it connected to world, but no magic on the LFG window.

Code:
---------------------------------------------
7863 [04.30. - 17:51:24] Starting Log: logs/eqemu_queryserv.log
7863 [04.30. - 17:51:24] Using database 'peq' at localhost:3306
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

   

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:29 PM.


 

Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
EQEmulator is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Except where otherwise noted, this site is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
       
Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template by Bluepearl Design and vBulletin Templates - Ver3.3