gcc 3.2 the right way?

[Trumpcard]

Yep, thats what we are trying to do...

I havent been able to find any information on porting from gcc 2.95.x to 3.2, they changed the ABI drasticlly enough to cause a slew of template instatiation errors. I dont do professional C++ development anymore, mostly JAVA, so i'm not the best person to ask. We're looking into trying to figure out how to port the code over, but are you suggesting we shouldnt try to find a way to keep our servers up and compiling until we are able to modify the code for the new gcc version?

I agree porting code is the right solution, but there are two types of problem resolutions, short term fixes and long term solutions. Porting is a long term solution.