Very true Manchukwo. I think everyone should be able to use TL'ers to a zone like Qeynos Hills as someone metioned before, but I wouldn't like it everyone could use a TL'er to get into a higher level zone. Everyone would just be lazy and bind near those npcs.
Having extra TL'ers in cities for guilds would help for a few reasons:
1. Lets say a guild is in Permafrost trying to kill Vox. If a member signs on late and their guild controls a city, having a TL'er to port to Perma or close to there would be extremelly convienient for that guild, and it would help keep single people just running through zones.
2. I dont think the problem is having all of the zones up, its mainly just with having 1 or 2 people in each zone.
3. Guilds could always ally with other guilds to let that other guild use their npcs.
4. Yes this wont eliminate having people spread out completely, but my guess is that 30% or even more of the time that people are running through a zone is because they are just trying to get to where their guild is hunting in.
5. If anyone had fast access to get to a higher lvl zone, you would see a bunch people trying to take out mobs they shouldnt thus making guilds that can take out that mob wait. Or that guild may just not feel like waiting and kill those people.
6. Epics seem to be too easy to get once you find the npc for your class. Having more guarded cities would make it so that you would need your guild to help you get your epic. It would make it tougher yet it would be a funner experience.
The ability of taking over cities is the #1 thing that makes GW stand out over the other servers. Right now it just seems that taking over a city really isnt a big deal other then to get your epic. By having more TL'ers in those cities, imo it would make the purpose in which GW was designed stand out a bit more.
Yeah people will still be running in useless zones, and this wont solve the problem completely, but I think it would help cut it down.
|
Hybrid Mode
