Well ok here we go...
1) It is his source so he did have ever right to say that it would never be released.
2) All I see is people CLAIMING he is someone, with no real proof that he actually is, and well that would be more then enough to piss anyone off... Constantly being accused of something? Yeah I would have to say that would be enough to get anyone riled.
3) It is interesting that a person with a join date of what, 2006? Is said to be banned so many times, and yet noone banned his two year old account? That alone seems a bit odd to me.
4) I read the posts about the guy people claim he is as well, when they posted links to the posts, the typing styles are completely different, so that is another strike against the theory, that they are infact the same person.
5) There are rules on this forum, everyone must accept them upon registration, and yet at the same time the administration lets the flame fests, go on against him for days at a time. The only person who gets consequences is him. That would be another thing that would more then likely tick a guy off enough to blow up after 2 years.
6) Once again aside from a FORMER Administrator's word which (A) I dont know this FORMER admin (B) I don't trust anyones word when there is accusations present unless there is PROOF of the accusation... There is NO proof that this guy ever came in under different names or is the guy he is accused of being. Why would he need to if his TWO year old account WASNT banned?
In closing there is a golden rule to live by, Treat others as you would have them treat you... Now Just what do you expect a person to do when he is constantly hounded, accused, targeted, attacked, flamed, insulted and so on and so forth? Just lie back and take it?
A really simple way to find out if he IS the person is to Attempt to get both into a video and voice chat at once, but that would more then likely only serve to prove the assumptions about him incorrect. So the real question is...
If they aren't the same person who is a big enough person to admit they are wrong?
|