Quote:
Originally Posted by KLS
That's not entirely true,[...]
|
Well since this is already a pretty silly thread I'll respond. What I said was:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesell
Uh, the GPL doesn't require EQC or anyone to distribute their work. It only describes what will happen if they do.
|
That statement is entirely true. You've mentally replace "work" with "source code". The word "work" is even specifically used in the license in the way same way that I used it in my statement. I'm not aware of anyone who uses the word "work" to refer specifically to source code.
Threaded Mode
