unix "Sleep" implementation bug

**KLS** · #1 11-13-2009, 11:20 PM

Okay I'm seeing what you're saying.

Code:

void Sleep(unsigned int x) {
        if (x <= 0  )
                return;
        if ( x>=1000 )
                usleep(999999);
        else
                usleep(x*1000);
}

Would be the implementation I'd use though, slightly faster due to no recursion and the functionality isn't... odd.

erde · #2 11-20-2009, 12:03 PM

There is no recursion

Sleep != sleep
I think you already know that, c++ is case sensitive

**KLS** · #3 11-20-2009, 01:30 PM

Yeah I didn't even notice the non-capital letter.