Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Trumpcard
That was probably my mistake when I was refactoring the DIST calculations.. Doh! Classic cut and paste error!
|
And I thought I was the only one who did that... note to self: cancel patent search on cut & paste errors.
Quote:
|
I tried to use the inline asm, but the implementation doesnt work well with gcc/gas.
|
Compatability. A very good reason to keep it out.
Quote:
|
stopped worrying about it when I eliminated 99.99% of the dist calls in the 1st place... (did a precheck before calling the dist function so its only called when its needed)
|
I saw that. A brilliant move.
Quote:
|
At this point, converting it too assembly might be an overcomplication with minimal performance gains, not that I dont appreciate the work necessary to generate it.
|
It really wasn't much work.
There are some people who might 1) do it just to prove to himself that it works and 2) think cutting clock cycles with ingenuity is actually fun.
The fifth amendment gives me the right to not mention the name of one of these people.
Threaded Mode
