Go Back   EQEmulator Home > EQEmulator Forums > Archives > Archive::General > Archive::General Discussion

Archive::General Discussion Archive area for General Discussion's posts that were moved here after an inactivity period of 90 days.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-08-2004, 06:06 AM
Mortamer
Hill Giant
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 181
Default Working on just one version of eq?

Wouldnt EQEmu be much more stable, and able to grow a lot faster with the same (or less) development effort if only one version of EQ was being worked on? If you had someone else (using baron-sprites license) host a patcher then you could focus development on making current features more stable and adding new ones instead of making it compatible with the latest eqlive? You could also have a license saying that your only allowed to use the patcher if you have purchased EQ (and would already have the right to those files). I think if you had appropriate licensing a patcher hosted by a 3rd party wouldnt get you in trouble, and if sony wanted you out of the picture they wouldnt need a patcher to do it (and I doubt they'd care much about a patcher). [disclaimer]I am not asking for warez of any kind, if the mods view this post as against the rules, please delete it and I hope you don't ban me =)[/disclaimer]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-08-2004, 06:11 AM
gottasummer
Discordant
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New Hampshire, USA
Posts: 267
Default

hmm scorpious2k patcher works... anyhow, yeah I agree that the current build should be worked on before anything else gets brought up like the newest eqlive stuff... allthough the algorithm can be cracked, it is possible... but... we should be concerned on the latest build, getting it to go from a DR to final, I am not an official dev, so I dont know what has been planned.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-08-2004, 06:27 AM
Cisyouc
Demi-God
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Heaven.
Posts: 1,260
Default Re: Working on just one version of eq?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mortamer
Wouldnt EQEmu be much more stable, and able to grow a lot faster with the same (or less) development effort if only one version of EQ was being worked on? If you had someone else (using baron-sprites license) host a patcher then you could focus development on making current features more stable and adding new ones instead of making it compatible with the latest eqlive? You could also have a license saying that your only allowed to use the patcher if you have purchased EQ (and would already have the right to those files). I think if you had appropriate licensing a patcher hosted by a 3rd party wouldnt get you in trouble, and if sony wanted you out of the picture they wouldnt need a patcher to do it (and I doubt they'd care much about a patcher). [disclaimer]I am not asking for warez of any kind, if the mods view this post as against the rules, please delete it and I hope you don't ban me =)[/disclaimer]
Um... There ARE patchers out there, and we ARE working on previous patches. So, I have no clue what this post is about.
__________________
namespace retval { template <class T> class ReturnValueGen { private: T x; public: ReturnValueGen() { x = 0; }; T& Generator() { return x; }; }; } int main() { retval::ReturnValueGen<int> retvalue; return retvalue.Generator(); }
C++ is wonderful.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-08-2004, 06:52 AM
2flare
Fire Beetle
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 6
Default

Yes but they don't work for every version out there. New users for example cannot play. And these patchers currently available don't help. His point is clear to me, he's wants EQEmulator to be acessible to more people.

I'm not into all this technical stuff so I don't know exactly what he's explaning but if it could work, it be great :P
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-08-2004, 07:06 AM
sokerflare
Fire Beetle
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 12
Default

Actually I think his point was rather than making updates to EQemu to compensate for the patches that sony has release concentrate on making EQemu fully functional with all the little things like HT and LH fully operational. I think he is suggesting that someone else puts up a patcher and takes the risk of getting in trouble (using baron-sprites license) &lt;-- [I dont know what that means excuse ignorance] so that when new people who people who patched could play the old version of eq because its not important to keep up with the latest live patch in comparison to getting old stuff working. Its kind the same arguement people have with Sony releasing more expansions without finishing the content released with ruins of kunark.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-08-2004, 07:09 AM
Cisyouc
Demi-God
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Heaven.
Posts: 1,260
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2flare
Yes but they don't work for every version out there.
There is a patcher for DR4 and a few for DR6 (that I know of). There aren't any 5.6 non-DR servers on the login servers that I know of, and if there were I'm sure they'd have a backpatcher. If you don't have the version of EQ for the server you wish to run, well, you shouldn't be hosting a server really.


-edit- The Source Code for EQEMu is NOT fool-proof. Look at Winter's Roar, only like 1/3 of their EMu code is the original code, its all been revamped to work better. So yes, we do try to update EMu to the latest version and its not perfect, but that is kinda your job once you get it at least up. Newcomers CAN get on to EQEMu usually, but the latest patch broke most of the other backpatches. Just have patience for the new EMu to be released in the CVS.

Wait, and it will come. Or, work on the source /shrug.
__________________
namespace retval { template <class T> class ReturnValueGen { private: T x; public: ReturnValueGen() { x = 0; }; T& Generator() { return x; }; }; } int main() { retval::ReturnValueGen<int> retvalue; return retvalue.Generator(); }
C++ is wonderful.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-08-2004, 07:47 AM
mattmeck
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

This question gets asked many many times a month, I think this is the third or fourth time in the last 2 weeks its been asked.


There are a whole list of reasons why they dont do this, read back some if you want the exact reasons the short answer is


NO
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-08-2004, 08:18 AM
cofruben
Old-EQEmu Developer
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Spain
Posts: 323
Default

we need to collect opcodes from live to add new features,so we can't work in one .
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-08-2004, 11:33 AM
Facet42
Fire Beetle
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 25
Default

I think that the point Motramer is trying to get at is that there is more time spent on trying to keep the codebase compatible with the latest version of the client than is spent on fixing the various bugs / missing features. The major issue, I believe, is that no-one has written an EQEmu compatible client. IMHO, if someone wrote a compatible client then any Sony related code / protocols could be dropped and there would be no issues what-so-ever with legality.
__________________
This signature left intentionally blank.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-08-2004, 11:36 AM
Melwin
Fire Beetle
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 15
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Facet42
I think that the point Motramer is trying to get at is that there is more time spent on trying to keep the codebase compatible with the latest version of the client than is spent on fixing the various bugs / missing features. The major issue, I believe, is that no-one has written an EQEmu compatible client. IMHO, if someone wrote a compatible client then any Sony related code / protocols could be dropped and there would be no issues what-so-ever with legality.
There'd also be no connection with EQLive apart from using their zone files and models.
__________________
Shards of Dalaya Staff Administrator
I have stairs in my house.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 08-08-2004, 11:39 AM
Facet42
Fire Beetle
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 25
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Melwin
There'd also be no connection with EQLive apart from using their zone files and models.
Which of course can also be replaced.
__________________
This signature left intentionally blank.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-08-2004, 12:49 PM
bbum
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 245
Default

then its no longer eqemu man.. its a new game on eq engine

when people look for this site, they want to play eq. on a free server. either legit or non-legit. i dont think anyone really comes looking for a new game on the eq engine.

because really, we blow cock at makin games. especially games as leet as eq.

wait.. whats this thread about again?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-09-2004, 02:08 AM
Mortamer
Hill Giant
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 181
Default

Thinking about this more, I realized I was probably going about it pretty much wrong. Heres baron-sprites license to make my post make a little more sense http://www.eqemulator.net/forums/viewtopic.php?t=16426 .
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

   

All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 PM.


 

Everquest is a registered trademark of Daybreak Game Company LLC.
EQEmulator is not associated or affiliated in any way with Daybreak Game Company LLC.
Except where otherwise noted, this site is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
       
Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Template by Bluepearl Design and vBulletin Templates - Ver3.3